Media statements issued never do get media coverage, and if it does it often does not report all that is stated. Given the fact, there seem to be no real documentation of all these civil society voices, this Blog has been started hoping to capture and preserve the voices of civil society for all. Appreciate it if you could forward me (chef@tm.net.my) statements that have not been picked up by this Blog.

Saturday, April 2, 2011

SAWO :- Drop Sexist MP Bung Moktar Radin from next election!

1 April 2011

Drop Sexist MP Bung Moktar Radin from next election!

Kinabatangan MP Bung Mokhtar Radin has scandalized the people of Sabah once again. We expect our leaders to make us proud to be Sahabans. His repeated sexist and uncouth remarks on women has made Sabahans a laughing stock to the rest of the nation and the world.

We are ashamed and demoralized that he is representing us in the Dewan Rakyat. Because of him we are a target of ridicule amongst other Malaysians.

Bung Mokhtar’s antics in the Dewan Rakyat made a mockery of the government’s efforts to promote gender sensitivity and equality in our society.

The Dewan Rakyat is entrusted to pass laws to safeguard the interests and well-being of women in the country. It is appalling that Bung Mokhtar is allowed to repeatedly make derogatory remarks about women and not get censured or disciplined immediately. This is despite the demands by Datuk Sharihzat and other MPs for him to retract his statements.

Bung’s conduct has tainted the image of the Dewan Rakyat. How can we Malaysians in particular women be confident that the Dewan Rakyat would strive to enact laws for the benefit of women?. Women and other NGOS have been campaigning for enactment of a Sexual Harassment Act since the start of the VAW campaign in the 1980s.

Bung Mokhtar’s disrespectful remarks about women in the Dewan Rakyat is very demoralizing for all those in both government and NGO sectors who have been working to increase women’s participation in the work  force and  in the  development of our country. His remarks will further entrench negative stereotypes of women which is one of the major constraints working against the empowerment of women.

Perhaps Bung Mokhtar has forgotten that half of the communities that he represents are women. By being derogatory to women, he is showing that he does not appreciate their support nor their contribution. Further, he has also shown that he does not respect the women’s husbands, fathers, sons, and all their male relatives.

We call upon the Gender Caucus in the Dewan Rakyat to increase their efforts in gender sensitizing the MPs to ensure that the Dewan Rakyat is not gender bias and sexist.

In the int erest of good governance we call upon our Prime Minister as head of Barisan National and our Chief Minister as head of Sabah Barisan National not to select sexist leaders like Bung Moktar for the next general election. 



Winnie Yee
President
Sabah Women’s Action -Resource Group (SAWO)
Lot 23, 3rd Floor, Block C,
Damai Point Commercial Centre.
Off Jln Damai, Luyang, 88300 Kota Kinabalu Sabah
Tel: 088-269291
E-mail: sawo2@streamyx.com
Website: www.sawo.org.my

SUARAM: SELANGOR FOI ENACTMENT: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD FOLLOW THE DEMOCRATIC EXAMPLE

SUARA RAKYAT MALAYSIA
Address: 433A, Jalan 5/46, Gasing Indah, 46000 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

Telephone: +6 03 7784 3525 Fax: +6 03 7784 3526

Email: suaram@suaram.net Web: www.suaram.net

PRESS STATEMENT: 1 APRIL 2011

SELANGOR FOI ENACTMENT: THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD FOLLOW THE DEMOCRATIC EXAMPLE

Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM) congratulates the Selangor State Government for passing the Freedom of Information (FOI) Enactment today. This first FOI legislation in Malaysia and the initiative was taken by the Selangor State Government together with NGOs and the people of Selangor.

SUARAM commends this commitment by the State Government towards providing legal and official channels for people to access official information. Such mechanisms play a crucial role in helping individuals and communities alike make informed decisions on matters that could affect their lives and livelihood. Further, FOI legislation is a very crucial step towards competency, accountability and transparency in governance.

Civil society organisations and opposition political parties in Malaysia have long called for the abolition of the Official Secrets Act (OSA 1972) in favour of FOI legislation which should clearly and narrowly define the boundaries of official secrecy. SUARAM too looks forward to the implementation of the regulation for the rakyat to benefit from the law.

The Selangor State Government now has made a genuine breakthroughs as far as the promoting a more democratic society and awaits its contemporaries in Penang to follow suit at the next State Assembly meeting end of this month.

Now the question really lies at the Federal Government on its abolition of the OSA. The Federal Government should follow the democratic example set by the Pakatan Rakyat government after being in power for 3 years compared with 54 years of Barisan Nasional rule.

Released by,

Sarah Devaraj

Local and Participatory Democracy

SUARAM Coordinator

013 3470860

Friday, April 1, 2011

PERMAS:- Written Promise by Selangor Government Does Not Help Urban Settlers in 2011

HAK TANAH UNTUK PENEROKA BANDAR KAMPUNG RAILWAY DI SG BULUH

kenyataan akhbar: 30 hb. Mac, 2011


Oleh: Mr. Tan Jo Hann, President Persatuan Masyarakat Selangor & Wilayah Persekutuan (PERMAS)
HP: 019-2145451,
Email: jotan@pc.jaring.my


Hari ini adalah satu hari yang amat sedih dan mengecewakan bagi 50 keluarga bekas masyarakat peneroka bandar kampung keretapi di Sg Buluh yang telah menunggu selama 20 tahun sejak 1992 untuk dapat tanah yang telah dijanjikan kepada mereka oleh pejabat tanah Gombak dan Kerajaan Negeri Selangor masa itu.

Setelah hampir 10 tahun kes ini dibicarakan dalam mahkamah tinggi, Pada 30hb Mac 2011 mahkamah telah membatalkan kes yang difail oleh penduduk terhadap pejabat tanah.

Menurut Hakim Hinshawati Shariff, keputusan ini berdasarkan kepada suatu aspek bahawa kes mereka “Tiada Balasan”. Ini bermaksud, untuk sebuah perjanjian menjadi sah, pemberian dan penerimaan harus berlaku, tetapi dalam kes ini, kerana mereka tidak memiliki tanah tersebut, mereka tidak berhak menerima tanah di lot lain sebagai pampasan walaupun mereka meninggalkan tempat itu secara rela untuk memberi laluan kepada landasan keretapi. Oleh itu, perjanjian yang dibuat oleh mereka dengan pejabat tanah masa itu tidak bernilai dan tidak perlu dipatuhi oleh Pejabat Tanah. Tetapi, penduduk di perkampungan itu meninggalkan tempat itu dengan rela sebab dijanjikan tanah dan sekarang mereka dibiarkan ditengah jalan selepas 20 tahun.

Keputusan penuh kes ini belum dikeluarkan lagi, tetapi pokoknya kes ini telah dibatalkan. Bagaimanapun, Peneroka bandar Kg Keretapi ini tidak akan berdiam diri dan menerima ketidakadilan ini.

Perjuangan ini sepatutnya boleh diselesaikan oleh kerajaan negeri Selangor di bawah pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat yang telah memerintah selama dua setengah tahun ini. Pada bulan April, 2008, penduduk kampung ini
telah mengirim memorandum kepada Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim yang telah berjanji untuk menyelesaikan masalah mereka. Tetapi sampai sekarang, tiada apa-apa tindakan dari pihak mereka.

Walaupun hak tanah penduduk in telah dirampas oleh bekas Kerajaan Negeri selangor dibawah pimpinan Mohd Khir Toyo, Menteri Besar pada masa itu.Yang amat mengecewakan adalah kerajaan Selangor semasa ini pun tidak mengambil langkah yang efektif untuk memulangkan hak tanah kepada 50 keluarga peneroka ini.

PERMAS bersama penduduk kampung ini akan membuat rayuan mahkamah. Selain daripada itu, kami juga bercadang untuk membuat suatu rayuan yang terakhir kepada Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim untuk
mempertahankan hak tanah peneroka tersebut dan juga menunaikan janji Pakatan Rakyat yang telah di buat hampir 3 tahun lalu !

Latarbelakang permasalahan peneroka bandar Kg Railway di Sg. Buluh

 Pada 7hb. Januari 1992, bekas penghuni “Railway Lines” Sungai Buloh telah  menerima notis pengusiran daripada KTM supaya berpindah dari kawasan  “Railways Lines” dengan tujuan pembinaan projek landasan berkembar KTM.

Seramai 229 buah keluarga ditawarkan lot tanah yang bernombor 1 hingga 229 oleh Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Gombak (Encik Hj. Bahari B. Mohamed Jabar) secara bertulis melalui surat bertarikh 7hb. Januari 1992. Lokasi lot-lot tanah yang ditawarkan terletak di Matang Pagar sebagai gantian bagi tapak rumah

Kami diberitahu bahawa lot-lot tanah tersebut akan dibersihkan serta  diratakan dalam masa enam bulan. Sementara itu, 100 daripada kami  dipindahkan ke rumah panjang Rawang dan yang lain terpaksa mencari tempat perlindungan sendiri. Selepas dua tahun menunggu, kami mendapati tanah tersebut masih tidak dibersihkan seperti yang dimaklumkan oleh Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah Gombak.

Pada bulan Jun 1996, papan tanda dinaikkan (dengan kebenaran Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah Gombak) di tanah kami mengumumkan bahawa “rumah kos rendah akan didirikan oleh Syarikat Ikatan Rapi Sdn. Bhd” di atas tanah kami. Malangnya, kerja-kerja pembinaan telah dijalankan tanpa sebarang persetujuan
atau perbincangan dengan penduduk.

Sejak itu, beberapa langkah telah diambil untuk mempertahankan hak tanah kami seperti penyerahan memorandum kepada YAB Menteri Besar Selangor, menghantar surat-surat bantahan kepada Pejabat Daerah dan Tanah Gombak, mengadakan perjumpaan dengan Dato’ Seri Samy Velu dan sebagainya.

Perbicaraan kes menuntut hak tanah milik kami telah di tunda beberapa kali dalam tempoh 9 tahun ini, dengan berbagai jenis alasan seperti fail kes telah hilang (berlaku sebanyak 3 kali), tuan hakim bercuti/sakit dan
lain lain alasan.

Mengikut undang-undang, kerja-kerja pembinaan mesti dihentikan selagi kes perbicaraan masih belum selesai. Akan tetapi, Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Gombak telah mengetepikan arahan tersebut dan sekarang rumah rumah PKNS telah siap di Matang Pagar dan telah diduduki oleh pembeli-pembeli dari tempat lain.

Tuntutan ini merupakan tuntutan yang telah kami laungkan selama 19 tahun ini iaitu:
 •    Kami mahukan lot tanah berukuran 40 kaki x 60 kaki persegi di Matang Pagar yang telah dijanjikan oleh Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Gombak.
 •    Kami juga mahu tanah tersebut dibersihkan, diratakan dan dilengkapi dengan infrastruktur asas iaitu air, elektrik, jalan, sistem perparitan seperti yang dijanjikan.

 Kini sudah 19 tahun berlalu, masalah kami masih tidak diselesaikan dan kami masih menanti-nanti untuk mendapat tanah lot yang dijanjikan dengan penuh harapan. Kami berharap keputusan mahkamah akhirnya akan memberi keadilan kepada keluarga-keluarga yang sudah dinafikan hak milik tanah yang telah dijanjikan hampir 20 tahun lalu tetapi telah dikecewakan. Walau bagaimanapun, kita tetap akan berjuang untuk mendapat hak kami.


CIJ: Selangor FOI Enactment a breakthrough amid culture of secrecy

Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) Malaysia
27C Jalan Sarikei, off Jalan Pahang
53000 Kuala Lumpur
Website: cijmalaysia.org
Email: cijmalaysia@gmail.com
Tel: 03 4023 0772
Fax: 03 4023 0769

1 April 2011

Media statement: Selangor FOI Enactment a breakthrough amid culture of secrecy

The Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) Malaysia welcomes the Freedom of Information (FOI) Enactment (Selangor) 2010 that was passed by the State Legislative Assembly in Shah Alam today.

This Enactment is a historic step toward transparency in governance and government accountability, even though it only encompasses information held by departments, local councils and entities fully owned and under full control of the Selangor state government.

We would like to congratulate the proponents of this law – from the state government to civil society – for this breakthrough. The passing of the FOI Enactment (Selangor) is all the more remarkable given that it exists within an ingrained culture of secrecy strongly backed by the Official Secrets Act (1972) at the Federal level.

We note that the Enactment that was passed today is an improvement from the watered-down version tabled for first hearing in July 2010. The improvements include, but are not limited to:

1. Acknowledgment of the right to information, rather than an opportunity given by the state
2. An obligation to reveal information
3. Possibility of review by the courts
4. A more independent State Information Board (to replace the Appeals Board)
5. A narrower list of exemptions, with a public interest override
6. Protection from prosecution, sanctions, suit etc for Information Officers or government officers who disclose information in good faith
7. 20-year time limit for keeping information confidential.

However, a quick look at the Enactment reveals some glaring problems which will prevent the rakyat from enjoying the full benefits of a FOI law:

1. A FOI law should entrench the right to information, whereas the preamble to this Enactment qualifies it as reasonable access to information – unneccessarily so, since there are exemptions provided by the law.

2. The law does not mandate the periodic publication of information. Known as the principle of proactive disclosure, this provision would help to reduce the administrative burden on the Information Officers, and increase transparency across all public bodies.

3. Lack of details re the appointment to the State Information Board (Section 17(2)). This must be an open and transparent process where the public can nominate candidates and the shortlist is published. This will strengthen the independence of the Board, which is an important feature for its success as adjudicator and monitor for the application of this law.

4. Section 18(1) which is about protecting the sanctity of information should not penalise the applicants for using the information in a different way from the reasons stated in the application.

5. While it is reasonable to charge for application fees, Section 6(3) merely states that the fee will be decided upon by the state authorities. A good FOI law must stipulate that the fees be kept low. Otherwise, it can be an administrative obstacle which denies the public affordable access to their right to information.

CIJ, which leads the FOI Task Force of the Coalition for Good Governance, will be scrutinising the Enactment to identify other gaps and convey them to the Selangor Legislative Assembly soon. We look forward to the royal assent of the Enactment, which will put Malaysia on the roadmap to a freedom of information regime and break away from the culture of secrecy. It is high time the Federal Government follow suit to show its commitment to combat corruption and promote good governance.

For further information please contact CIJ Executive Officer Masjaliza Hamzah, Tel: 016-379 5901 03-4023 0772.

--
Web: cijmalaysia.org
Tel: +603-4023 0772
Twitter: CIJ_Malaysia
Facebook: Centre for Independent Journalism

The Centre for Independent Journalism, Malaysia (CIJ) is a non-profit organisation that aspires for a society that is democratic, just and free, where all peoples will enjoy free media and the freedom to express, seek and impart information.

Friday, January 28, 2011

126 : RCI Must Establish Cause of Teoh’s Death and Have Credible Members to show Najib’s sincerity

Civil Society Joint Statement              2011-01-11
No Lame Duck!

RCI Must Establish Cause of Teoh’s Death and Have Credible Members to show Najib’s sincerity

We, the undersigned civil society organisations (CSOs) say “NO” to the “lame duck” Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) on the late Teoh Beng Hock which Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak intends to set up.

We demand that the RCI to be given specific and comprehensive Terms of Reference [TOR] to clear all doubts pertaining to Beng Hock’s mysterious and torturous death.

We fully support the position of the Malaysians for Beng Hock Movement that the TOR of the proposed RCI must include the following:

a.      Investigating thoroughly and identifying the cause of Beng Hock’s death, especially identifying the cause of bruise which appeared on his neck.

b.      Reviewing and reforming the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) investigation protocols to be in line with human rights standards and international best practices.    

c.      Identifying the political, administrative and criminal responsibility of all individuals or institutions whose decisions and acts had directly or indirectly led to the death of Teoh Beng Hock and recommending specific actions to charge or penalize these individuals;

d.      Investigating into other allegations of torture, illegal detention and other misconducts by MACC if and when necessary and proposing reforms in the formal procedures of and actual practices in MACC investigation and interrogation.

In upholding the cardinal principle of transparency, we demand that the Report of the RCI and all related documents be made available to the public, without conditions.

Transparent Appointment of RCI Members
In order to show his sincerity in seeking the truth and justice, the Prime Minister has to ensure transparency and independence in the selection and appointment of RCI members.
The selection panel must include representatives of the Teoh family, Bar Council, Selangor State Government and human rights community to ensure full consultation and credibility.   

We strongly urge the government to appoint only individuals who meet the following criteria to the RCI:
  • Is an outstanding and professional figure with high integrity
  • Has a proven track record of defending human rights
  • Has relevant experience in the area of human rights, law enforcement, judiciary and non-governmental activism.
In this regard, we fully support the list of potential commissioners proposed by the Malaysians for Beng Hock Movement as follows:

 No
Name
Background
1
Tun Musa Hitam
Former Deputy Prime Minister and the first  chairperson of Malaysia Human Rights Commission (SUHAKAM)
2
Raja Aziz Addruse
Former Bar Council president and former president of the National Human Rights Society (Hakam)
3
N.H. Chan
Former Court of Appeal judge
4
Tun Haniff Omar
Former Inspector General of Police
5
Datuk Ambiga Sreenivasan
Former Bar Council president and awarded International Women of Courage 2009
6
Dr. Irene Fernandez
Director of NGO Tenaganita and awarded Right Livelihood Award in 2005
7
A medical professional upon consultation of Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), its ex-president Dr Ronald McCoy (a human rights defender) and other members of the medical community.   

We urge the Federal Government not to finalise the RCI and announce its membership without consulting the Teoh family, Bar Council, Selangor State Government and human rights community. Otherwise, the RCI will be seen as a public relations exercise of the Federal Government, with its independence and credibility called into question even before embarking on its task.

Initiated by :

The KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall
 
Endorsed by :   (updated till 2011.01.11, 2pm)

  1. The KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall
  2. Amnesty International Malaysia
  3. Pusat Pembangunan Kebudayaan LLG
  4. SUARAM
  5. Young Buddhist Association of Malaysia
  6. Jemaah Islah Malaysia
  7. Islamic Renaissance Front Malaysia
  8. Persekutuan Alumni Han Chiang Malaysia
  9. Group of Concern Citizen
  10. KOMAS
  11. JERIT
  12. Malaysia Students' Association In Taiwan
  13. All Women Action Society of Malaysia,AWAM
  14. Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia
  15. Solidariti Mahasiswa Malaysia
  16. Gabungan Mahasiswa islam Se-Malaysia
  17. Gerakan Demokratik Mahasiswa dan Pemuda Malaysia
  1. Kesatuan Mahasiswa New Era Kolej
  2. Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor,Empower
  3. Persatuan Prihantin Komuniti Kuala Lumpur & Selangor,PRIHATIN
  4. Persatuan Masyarakat Selangor dan Wilayah Persekutuan,PERMAS
  1. Bahagian Pemuda Persatuan Char Yong S’gor dan Wilayah Persekutuan
  1. Bahagian Wanita Dewan Perhimpunan Cina KL & S’gor
  2. Persatuan Wui Leng Kuala Lumpur & Selangor
  3. Persatuan Alumni PBTUSM Selangor & KL
  4. Persatuan Alumni Nam Hiang KL
  5. Bhg Pemuda Persatuan Alumni Sekolah Serdang
  6. Jawatankuasa Bertindak Peneroka Bandar Jalan Papan
  1. Persatuan Penduduk Tmn Muhibbah Seri Kembangan
  1. Jawatankuasa Penduduk Zon 23 MPSJ
  2. Persatuan Alumni Kampung Sekolah Ampang
  3. Persatuan Singa Naga Jin Ying Ampang
  4. Gerakan Mahasiswa UPM
  5. Gerakan Mahasiswa UUM
  6. Gerakan Mahasiswa USM
  7. University Malaya New Youth Association
  8. Youth For Change, Y4C
  9. Penggerak Belia Zon 23,MPSJ
  10. Bahagian Pemuda Persatuan Hokkien WP & S’gor
  11. Youth Section of Malacca Chinese Assembly Hall
  12. Youth Section of Negeri Sembilan Chinese Assembly Hall
  1. Persekutuan Persatuan-Persatuan Bekas Pelajar-Pelajar
      Sekolah-Sekolah China Johor
  1. Persatuan Alumni Taiwan,Johor Bahru
  2. Kelab Penyokong SJKC Damansara Kluang
  3. Penang Watch
  4. Jawatankuasa Penaja SUARAM Kluang
  5. Perak Youth Graduate Association
  6. Gabungan Murid-Murid Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah Persendirian Perak
  1. Persatuan Murid-Murid Tua Sekolah Menengah Shen Jai
  2. Bahagian Pemuda Persataun Keturunan Ng's Perak
  3. Persatuan Hopo Kawasan Bidor, Perak
  4. Penang Chinese Independent Schools' Education Society
  1. Persatuan Alumni Han Chiang Pulau Pinang
  2. Chung Hwa School Union
  3. Kong Min School Old Pupils Association
  4. Persatuan Kawan Karib Pulau Pinang
  5. Pertubuhan Bekas Murid Sekolah Pei Yu, Seberang Perai Utara
  1. Persatuan Murid-Murid Tua Sekolah Tong Sian
  2. Youth Section of KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall
  3. Persatuan Bekas Murid-Murid Han Chiang Seberang Perai
  4. Persatuan Bekas Murid Sekolah Seng Keo Butterworth
  5. Li Hwa School Ex-Pupils Association Butterworth
  6. New Era College Alumni Association
  7. WAMI
  8. Lawyer for Liberty
  9. Free Public Forum
  10. Red Rose Youth Centre
  11. Persatuan Ann Kooi Hulu Selangor
  12. Persatuan Murid-murid Tua Sekolah Kuen Cheng KL
  13. The Federation of Chinese Associations, Johore State
  14. Sarawak Central Region Friendship Association
  15. Student Progressive Front NEC,SPFNEC
  16. Persatuan Bahasa Tiong Hua USM
  17. Persatuan Bahasa Cina UM
  18. Persatuan Bahasa Tiong Hua UUM
  19. Persatuan Bahasa Tiong Hua UPM
  20. Solidariti Mahasiswa Malaysia SMM
  21. Gabungan Anak Muda & Pelajar GAMP 
  22. Sarawak Dayak Iban Association  SADIA
  23. Borneo Resources Institute Malaysia  BRIMAS
  24. Sarawak Native Customary Rights Land Network  TAHABAS
  25. Jaringan Orang Asal Se-Malaysia  JOAS
  26. Persatuan Wanita Desa Sarawak  WADESA
  27. Sarawakians Access  SACCESS
  28. Community Information and Communications Centre  CICOM
  29. Women’s Aid Organisation  WAO
  30. Community Action Network
  31. Tenaganita
  32. Community Development Centre  CDC
  33. Youth Wing of the Council of Churches of Malaysia  CCMY
  34. Monitoring Sustainability of Globalization  MSN
  35. 528 Media Action Group
  36. Persatuan Penganut Agama Buddha Fo Guang Malaysia
  1. SOS Save Ourselves
  2. MALVU Malaysian Voters Union
  3. Negeri Sembilan Chinese Assembly Hall
  4. The Association of Graduates from Universities & Colleges of China, M’sia
  5. Federation of Chinese Schools Alumni Association of Malaysia
99.  Selangor and Kuala Lumpur Hokkien Association
100.   Persatuan Persahabatan Berpanjangan N.Sembilan
101.   Eng Choon Association Negeri Sembilan
102.   Persatuan Belia Prihatin Malaysia Cawangan N.Sembilan
103.   Lai Association Negeri Sembilan
104.   N.S. Teo Chew Youth
105.   N.S. Kwang Tung Youth
106.   N.S. Hainan Youth
107.   Chinese Methodist Church Seremban
108.   Kelab Sukandan Rekreasi Taman Layang-layang Seremban
109.  COMIT Selangor & Wilayah Persekutuan
110.   Persatuan Kebajikan Cahaya Wawasan S’gor
111.   Persatuan Kebajikan Bharatham Negeri Selangor
112.   Persatuan Wawasan India Selangor
113.   Consumer Association of Klang
114.   Persatuan Prihatian Belia Malaysia
115.   Pertubuhan Seni Music India Malaysia
116.   Young Malaysians Movement (YMM) Negeri Sembilan
117.  Perak Han Chiang Ex-Pupils Assocation
118.   Penang Yan Huang 312 Centre
119.   Negeri Sembilan Teo Chew Association
120.   Persatuan Belia Xiang Hui, Negeri Sembilan
121.   The Federation of Chinese Associations Malaysia Youth Section
122.  Penang Chinese Assembly Hall
123.   Chinese Schools Alumni Association of Kedah
124.   Centre for Independent Journalism, CIJ
125.   Human Rights Committee of BAR Coucil Malaysia
126.   Malaysia-China Chamber of Commerce

Thursday, January 20, 2011

CAP and SAM: Revoke approval for field trial of GM mosquitoes

CAP and SAM: Revoke approval for field trial of GM mosquitoes


CAP and Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM) call upon the National Biosafety Board (NBB) to revoke the approval given to the Institute for Medical Research (IMR) in October 2010 to release genetically modified (GM) male Aedes aegypti mosquitoes for the purpose of a field experiment.

The applicant and implementer of the field trial is the IMR which had developed the GM mosquitoes in a joint research with UK-based biotech company Oxitec Ltd. The field trial which was supposed to be carried out last December in uninhabited and inhabited sites in the districts of Bentong, Pahang and Alor Gajah, Melaka was reportedly delayed because of bad weather.
 
Following the NBB’s decision, CAP and SAM had submitted a memorandum to the Malaysian Government on 20 December 2010 raising our concerns on serious ethical, legal, public health and human rights issues.   Twenty-nine organizations in Malaysia and 87 civil society organizations throughout the world, concerned by the impending release of the GM mosquitoes had also raised their apprehension in open letters to the authorities.

Malaysia will be the first country to release this particular strain of GM Aedes aegypti mosquitoes OX513A (My1). The only other country which has released GM Aedes mosquitoes with the same transgenic construct is the Cayman Islands - a British overseas territory. In November 2010, international reports had revealed that Oxitec publicly announced its GM Aedes mosquitoes’ field trials in the Cayman Islands only one year after the event.

The field releases in the Cayman Islands in 2009 and 2010 were controversial and calls have been made for a transparent assessment of the full, long-term health and environmental impacts of these trials in the Cayman Islands, pending which, no further field releases of GM mosquitoes should occur anywhere else.

Besides this, GeneWatch UK, a science-based not-for-profit organisation, has conducted and published an investigation of Oxitec’s role in the development, patenting and promotion of the use of these genetically-modified (GM) mosquitoes. [Please see GeneWatch UK’s December 2010 report titled “Oxitec’s genetically-modified mosquitoes: in the public interest?”]

GeneWatch UK is concerned that the novelty of this application of GM technology has made regulators in several countries too dependent on advice provided by Oxitec which has a vested interest in speeding its products into the market place in order to generate financial returns for its investors. In GeneWatch UK’s view this means that a number of potential risks have been omitted or downplayed.

[Please click on the link below this statement to read GeneWatch UK's comments on Risk Assessment report of the  Malaysian Genetic Modification Advisory Committee (GMAC) for an application to conduct a limited Mark-Release-Recapture of Aedes aegypti (L.) wild type and OX513A strains].

The fact that this project involves the creation and propagation of a deadly insect and its eventual release in the natural environment means that it is a dangerous and risky enterprise.

The GM mosquitoes will be released into a complicated ecosystem, involving other mosquito species, predators and prey, the dengue virus, and the humans who are bitten. Because this system is poorly understood there remain unanswered questions about the impacts of the proposed releases.   

The outcome of this experiment is thus unpredictable and largely unknown. If the unintended occurs in the environment, these releases would be impossible to monitor, contain or mitigate and they are irreversible.

Mosquitoes, natural or engineered, do not respect national borders. It is not possible for any country to control mosquitoes from crossing their borders in this age of air travel and large scale movements of people and materials. For this reason, releasing a GM mosquito must be considered as a worldwide release as it will potentially affect every nation on the planet. Hence, were Malaysia’s neighbouring countries such as Singapore, Indonesia and Thailand officially informed about the impending release?

Given the unpredictable consequences and potential risks, the chances of things going wrong cannot be overstated. Why are we allowing ourselves to be guinea pigs for this doubtful technology? What if the experiment does not go according to plan and something goes terribly wrong with the release? First and foremost, Oxitec will not be wholly liable as IMR is the applicant for the release.

It is regrettable that the authorities seem intent on allowing the trials to go ahead, despite public calls to be cautious and to take into account the precautionary approach based on valid concerns. That we are dealing with GM insects especially disease-carrying mosquitoes’ on which there are very few guidelines for biosafety assessment simply because there is very little information to go on, should be a push for the precautionary approach.

Malaysia should uphold transparency, rigorous scientific standards, the precautionary principle, justice and human rights, and ethical and lawful practices. Otherwise, we will be opening the floodgates for foreign corporations to dump in Malaysia other GM insects, crops, food, feed and processing in the future. What is at stake is the health of Malaysians and our neighbours, our environment and biological diversity.

We hereby call upon the NBB in consultation with the Genetic Modification Advisory Committee to review and revoke the approval for the field release of these GM mosquitoes as allowed for under the Biosafety Act 2007.

Press Statement - 17 January 2011

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Joint Statement of BERSIH 2.0 and Sarawak CSOs 10 January 2011

Joint Statement of BERSIH 2.0 and Sarawak CSOs
10 January 2011 

[Released in Sarawak]

Bersih 2.0
Sadia
Malaysian Election Observers Network (MEO-Net) - Sarawak State Election Observation Mission 
Panggal Sarawak
Tabahas Sarawak
Sarawak Central Region Friendship Association

We, the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections 2.0 (BERSIH 2.0) and the undersigned civil society organisations (CSOs) in Sarawak, call upon the Election Commission, the Federal and State Governments and other relevant parties to implement the following reforms.

A:        Suffrage

1.      Increased Outreach of National Registration Department (NRD) and Election Commission (EC) – Disenfranchisement is a major issue in Sarawak as substantial percentage of Sarawakians are not registered as voters and even citizens because of insufficient documentation. The Federal agencies like National Registration Department (NRD) and Election Commission (EC) should expand and enhance their outreach to ensure maximum registration of citizens and voters. In particular, we call for:

a.      The NRD to have at least one mobile unit for  each of Sarawak’s 11 divisions.
b.     all rural settlements are visited by them at least once a year.
c.      Besides the Kuching state headquarters, the EC to set up an office in every of Sarawak’s 11 divisions.
d.     The Sarawak divisions of both NRD and EC to be led by Sarawakians and maximise employment of Sarawakians to provide more locally-informed and friendly service.

2.      Automatic Registration and related reforms. Democratic elections must be based on universal suffrage. That 4.2 million eligible citizens are still unregistered is a failure of democracy. The current voter registration drives are hampered by insufficient number of assistant registrars of voters and slow and non-transparent processing of new applications.  
To make the matters worse, the existing electoral rolls contain many deceased voters, fraudulent registrations and other errors, which may be largely solved if the Election Commission (EC) and the National Registration Department (NRD) can synchronise their data bases. In particular, we call for:
a.      As a temporary measure, appointment of more assistant registrars of voters from amongst non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and local government nominees, not just representatives of political parties.
b.      As a temporary measure, an online tracking system that allows new applicants to check the progress of their application of voter registrations.
c.      Automatic registration that allows all eligible citizens to vote as per their status on NRD database.
d.      The lowering of voting age from 21 to 18 in line with the global and regional trend.

3.      Absentee Voting Reform. The existing arrangement of postal voting is flawed in three ways. Firstly, it is imposed on military voters and in practice also police voters, who vote in a setting that may compromise their freewill and confidentiality and who are in practice treated as BN’s “fixed deposit” to tip off the balance in BN’s marginal constituencies. Secondly, it is available as an option to only: (a) civil servants and spouse overseas; (b) tertiary students and spouses overseas; (c) election workers; and not others away from home temporary, including East Malaysians visiting West Malaysia. Thirdly, while voters on ordinary voter list can apply to vote on postal ballot, those on postal voter list – like students or diplomats returning to Malaysia for holidays – cannot vote in ordinary polling stations and will be disenfranchised. We call for the following reforms:

a.      In principle, absentee voting is an option available to all but mandatory to none.
b.     There is only a single voting list, where everyone with a reasonable ground may apply to vote on postal ballot three weeks before polling day; so that no absentee voters can be identified before election and transferred across constituencies.
c.      To ease administration of absentee voting, polling should be held at least three weeks after nomination is closed.

4.      Increased access and protection for rural voters. Many native Sarawakians do not vote because of the distance from the polling stations. Meanwhile, transportation of ballot boxes to counting centre by helicopters triggers concern whether the ballots may be tampered. To increase access and protection for rural voters, we call for
a.      presiding officers, to be accompanied by  political parties’ polling agents, to bring ballot boxes to far remote villages.
b.      ballots to be counted in all polling stations before ballot boxes being transferred to the counting centres to avoid any possible rigging in the process of transportation.

5.      Removal of Fraudulently-Naturalised Foreigners. A Royal Commission of Inquiry should be set up to investigate and rectify fraudulent naturalisation of foreigners in Sarawak and Sabah.

B:         Contestation

6.      Nomination Reform. The requirement and process of nomination should be simplified to encourage contestation. In particular, we call for
a.      Reduction of deposit for both federal and state elections
b.      A nomination period of one week.

7.      Media Freedom. We call for thorough reform of all media-related laws to produce a pluralistic and competitive media environment in the long run. In the short run, we call for
a.      Free access to state-owned media for all contesting parties, which may take the form of televised debates and radio/television advertisement.
b.      Non-discriminatory access to private media for all contesting parties.
c.      Rights of reply for all candidates and party officials who are reported negatively.

8.      Political finance. Contemporary democratic elections are expensive but this should not leave elections a game of the rich, either as candidates or their financial backers. The current regulation has failed to promote transparency and inclusion. We call for the following reforms:
a.      Mandatory disclosure of all contributions in cash, in kind and in labour, and severe penalty for both the recipients and donors.
b.      Party to be made a unit of accounting alongside the candidate in election expense accounting,
c.      Public provision of campaign materials from collective leaflets to collective billboard for all contestants, making it more viable for resource-poor candidates to campaign.

9.      Promotion of Administrative Neutrality and Criminalisation of Discriminatory Practices. Elections are meaningless without level playing fields. State agencies, individual citizens, groups and corporations must not be allowed to discriminate against any contestants and undermine free and fair elections. The Election Offences Act should be amended or replaced by a new act to
a.      Prohibit the caretaker government at both federal and state levels to announce any major policy decisions, in the exception of emergencies, from dissolution of legislature to the swearing-in of the new government.
b.     Criminalise all federal and state officials who intentionally abuse government resources and power to promote or undermine certain candidates or parties in an election.
c.      Criminalise discriminatory practices by individual citizens, groups, business entities that aim to undermine level playing fields in elections, such as refusal to sell fuel and other goods and services to certain political parties and candidates.

10.   Election ObservationElection monitoring is vital to deter election rigging and enhance the legitimacy of elected governments. Unfortunately there have not been international election observation missions in Malaysia since 1990 while domestic election watchdogs like MAFREL are subject to restrictions and obstructions. Specifically, we propose and call for:
a.      The Election Commission (EC) to accredit international and domestic election observation missions liberally and professionally for all future elections including the upcoming Sarawak state election.
b.      The international community to request  Malaysia and Sarawak governments to observe the upcoming Sarawak state election and the federal election.
c.      The EC to propose the establishment of the legal right of election monitoring.
d.      ASEAN to establish a regional level election monitoring mechanism.

C:         Institutions

11.   Community and local elections. Elections should be expanded beyond the existing federal and state elections to enhance representation. At the community level this will minimise the incidences of these community leaders being utilised as tools by the government of the day to secure votes for the ruling coalition. In Sarawak, many state-government-appointed tuai rumah have split small rural communities as these leaders are not the ones recognised by the villagers in general.
 In particular, we demand:
a.      That the community leaders from tuai rumah, penghulu, pemancar to temenggung to be directly elected by their community  in accordance with their cultural traditions and not selected by the state government.
b.      That there be a third-tier elected government, modelling cabinet governments at federal and state levels, for cities/municipalities and divisions (excluding urban centres).

12.   Fair and reasonable constituency redelineation.  Elections must be based on the one-person-one-vote principle and aim to optimise representation and aggregation of community interests. The Election Commission (EC) must commit to maximally equal representation and minimisation of gerrymandering. In particular, we demand the following principles be adopted to the following principles in the constituency redelineation exercise for Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah which may begin this March and the one for Sarawak in two years’ time the earliest:
c.      That the largest state constituency in a state must not be larger than half of the smallest parliamentary constituency in the same state.
d.      That electoral constituencies must cross the boundaries of local authorities and divisions.
e.      That the demarcation of a local authority area or division into parliamentary and state constituencies must group communities of similar interests together.
f.       That local neighbourhoods must not be arbitrarily partitioned by electoral boundaries.






Maria Chin Abdullah
Executive Director
EMPOWER
13 Lorong 4/48E
46050 Petaling Jaya
Selangor, Malaysia
Tel:    603  77844977
Fax:   603  77844978
Email: empower05@gmail.com
Facebook: Empower Malaysia